10.03.2014 22:40, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> Ping!
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/324674/
>
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> hw/char/serial-pci.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/char/serial-pci.c b/hw/char/serial-pci.c
>> index 991c99f..e662b77 100644
>> --- a/hw/char/serial-pci.c
>> +++ b/hw/char/serial-pci.c
>> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ static int serial_pci_init(PCIDevice *dev)
>> return -1;
>> }
>>
>> + pci->dev.config[PCI_CLASS_PROG] = 0x02; /* 16550 compatible */
>> pci->dev.config[PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN] = 0x01;
>> s->irq = pci_allocate_irq(&pci->dev);
Hm. While this is an one-liner indeed, I'm not sure it's the right
value. From my pci.ids:
C 07 Communication controller
00 Serial controller
00 8250
01 16450
02 16550
03 16650
04 16750
05 16850
06 16950
so it seems correct thing to do.
What about multi_serial_pci_init() -- should it too set prog-if
like this?
Thanks,
/mjt