Am 27.02.2014 23:50, schrieb Jeff Cody:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:22:08PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> block-obj-y is not anymore part of common-obj-y, because "nesting"
>> variables is complicated and requires specifying the correct
>> ordering in the calls to unnest-vars.  However, because of this
>> we need to specify block-obj-y in the dependencies of the
>> target subdirectories.
>>
>> Thanks to Stefan Weil and Jeff Cody for suggesting the cause of
>> the regression.
>>
>> Reported-by: Peter Maydell <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  Makefile | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
>> index a443cd4..3938b6c 100644
>> --- a/Makefile
>> +++ b/Makefile
>> @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ subdir-dtc:dtc/libfdt dtc/tests
>>  dtc/%:
>>      mkdir -p $@
>>  
>> -$(SUBDIR_RULES): libqemuutil.a libqemustub.a $(common-obj-y)
>> +$(SUBDIR_RULES): libqemuutil.a libqemustub.a $(common-obj-y) $(block-obj-y)

Using SUBDIR_RULES here instead of SOFTMMU_SUBDIR_RULES (as in my patch)
includes more dependencies: $(block-obj-y) will also be built for the
user emulation code (i386-linux-user, ...) which does not need it. As
far as I see, SOFTMMU_SUBDIR_RULES is sufficient.

Stefan


>>  
>>  ROMSUBDIR_RULES=$(patsubst %,romsubdir-%, $(ROMS))
>>  romsubdir-%:
>> -- 
>> 1.8.5.3
>>
>>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jeff Cody <[email protected]>
> 
> 


Reply via email to