On 28 January 2014 09:56, Gerd Hoffmann <[email protected]> wrote: > The input layer moves to a model modeled roughly after the linux > event layer. It also uses qapi to create all the data types needed. > First, because it is convinient to have all the support code generated, > and also to make it easier to integrate with qmp some day. > > Porting work has only be done on the UI side so far. Input device > emulation is still to be done. > > SDL2 consists of dave's original patch with a bunch of cleanups on > top. Some of the cleanups depend on the new input layer code, thus > the incremental patches are sprinkled all over the patch series for > bisectability reasons. > > v2 fixes a few minor nits pointed out in v1 review. > > Pull request has the cocoa build fix from Peter squashed in > and is otherwise identical to v2. > > please pull, > Gerd > > The following changes since commit 0169c511554cb0014a00290b0d3d26c31a49818f: > > Merge remote-tracking branch 'qemu-kvm/uq/master' into staging (2014-01-24 > 15:52:44 -0800) > > are available in the git repository at: > > > git://git.kraxel.org/qemu tags/pull-input-1 > > for you to fetch changes up to 19f3059690bbb1ca6af8277bf262e4b9aea13f8f: > > input: remove index_from_keycode (no users) (2014-01-28 10:47:54 +0100)
This is a rather large series of patches none of which seem to have had any review, and several of which are missing their Signed-off-by: lines. I'm afraid I can't apply it (for the missing signoffs if nothing else). I know we have trouble sometimes getting sufficient review for patches, and I've submitted pull requests with patches without reviewed-by lines myself in the past when the patches had sat about on list for a few weeks untouched. But isn't anybody willing to review this? thanks -- PMM
