On 01/22/2014 09:16 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 22/01/2014 05:19, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto: >> On 12/11/2013 09:22 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >>> With the great help from Paolo, I am presenting yet another try of >>> bootindex >>> support on sPAPR, this time with some QOM fixes. Details are in the >>> commit messages. >>> Please, comment. Thanks. >>> >>> Alexey Kardashevskiy (5): >>> boot: extend get_boot_devices_list() to ignore suffixes >>> spapr-llan: add to boot device list >>> spapr-vio: fix firmware names >>> qdev: introduce FWPathProvider interface >>> spapr: define interface to fix device pathname >>> >>> Hervé Poussineau (1): >>> qom: detect bad reentrance during object_class_foreach >>> >>> Paolo Bonzini (2): >>> qom: do not register interface "types" in the type table >>> vl: allow customizing the class of /machine >>> >>> hw/core/Makefile.objs | 1 + >>> hw/core/fw-path-provider.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++ >>> hw/core/qdev.c | 18 +++++++++- >>> hw/net/spapr_llan.c | 3 ++ >>> hw/nvram/fw_cfg.c | 2 +- >>> hw/ppc/spapr.c | 80 >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >>> hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c | 2 ++ >>> include/hw/boards.h | 1 + >>> include/hw/fw-path-provider.h | 31 +++++++++++++++++ >>> include/sysemu/sysemu.h | 2 +- >>> qom/object.c | 17 +++++++-- >>> tests/Makefile | 1 + >>> vl.c | 11 ++++-- >>> 13 files changed, 193 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >>> create mode 100644 hw/core/fw-path-provider.c >>> create mode 100644 include/hw/fw-path-provider.h >> >> >> Some bits from this went upstream but none of them is mine. What am I >> missing here? Thanks. > > No idea, perhaps it's because the same patches were present in multiple > series? Alex, are you picking up what's left? > > Paolo
In the "Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] qom: detect bad reentrance during object_class_foreach" thread Andreas told me: === Be patient. 1) I am on holidays and thus not available full-time. 2) Alex has already sent out his ppc PULL, so no urgency. 3) As mentioned, I plan to post QOM and CPU PULLs later today. And no, you don't need to repost after parts of your series get applied pretty much unmodified. === So I wonder if I am not just patient enough :) -- Alexey
