On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:31:00PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 14/01/2014 16:25, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
> > I definitely think we want at least a basic molly-guard on
> > "module not compiled for this qemu"; we need not attempt
> > to make it impervious to somebody who's determined to get
> > around it, because that's impossible. Something like the
> > git hash / file hash rth proposes seems reasonable.
>
> What about the SHA1 of configure?
On its own that is insufficiently variable but if you combined with the
version + pkgversion strings that would be more viable - assuming the
RPM build passed '--pkgversion %{release}' to make it change on each
new build produced.
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
