On 11 December 2013 19:42, Tom Musta <tommu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/11/2013 1:40 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> All patches which touch fpu/ need to come with a statement >> (in the cover letter is fine) that the changes are licensed under >> both the softfloat-2a and -2b licenses [or under some license >> compatible with both, I guess]. (We're trying to relicense that >> area of the codebase at the moment.) > > Arrrrghhh!!!! I should have remembered that. Sucks that this stuff > can't be consistent with the rest of the code.
A reply here will do, you don't need to respin just for this. thanks -- PMM
