On 01.08.2013, at 16:12, Jason J. Herne wrote:

> From: "Jason J. Herne" <jjhe...@us.ibm.com>
> 
> Define new SCLP codes to improve code readability.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason J. Herne <jjhe...@us.ibm.com>
> ---
> hw/s390x/sclp.c         |    2 +-
> include/hw/s390x/sclp.h |    8 ++++++++
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/sclp.c b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
> index 86d6ae0..cb53d7e 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/sclp.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static void sclp_execute(SCCB *sccb, uint64_t code)
> {
>     S390SCLPDevice *sdev = get_event_facility();
> 
> -    switch (code) {
> +    switch (code & SCLP_NO_CMD_PARM) {

switch (code & ~SCLP_CMD_PARM)

Or are the upper bits parm as well? In fact, what about the upper 32 bits?


Alex

>     case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO:
>     case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO_FORCED:
>         read_SCP_info(sccb);
> diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h b/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
> index 231a38a..174097d 100644
> --- a/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
> +++ b/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,14 @@
> #define SCLP_CMD_WRITE_EVENT_DATA               0x00760005
> #define SCLP_CMD_WRITE_EVENT_MASK               0x00780005
> 
> +/* CPU hotplug SCLP codes */
> +#define SCLP_NO_CMD_PARM                        0xffff00ff
> +#define SCLP_HAS_CPU_INFO                       0x0C00000000000000ULL
> +#define SCLP_CMDW_READ_CPU_INFO                 0x00010001
> +#define SCLP_CMDW_CONFIGURE_CPU                 0x00110001
> +#define SCLP_CMDW_DECONFIGURE_CPU               0x00100001
> +#define SCLP_CMDW_CPU_CMD_PARM                  0xff00
> +
> /* SCLP response codes */
> #define SCLP_RC_NORMAL_READ_COMPLETION          0x0010
> #define SCLP_RC_NORMAL_COMPLETION               0x0020
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
> 


Reply via email to