On 01.08.2013, at 16:12, Jason J. Herne wrote: > From: "Jason J. Herne" <jjhe...@us.ibm.com> > > Define new SCLP codes to improve code readability. > > Signed-off-by: Jason J. Herne <jjhe...@us.ibm.com> > --- > hw/s390x/sclp.c | 2 +- > include/hw/s390x/sclp.h | 8 ++++++++ > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/hw/s390x/sclp.c b/hw/s390x/sclp.c > index 86d6ae0..cb53d7e 100644 > --- a/hw/s390x/sclp.c > +++ b/hw/s390x/sclp.c > @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static void sclp_execute(SCCB *sccb, uint64_t code) > { > S390SCLPDevice *sdev = get_event_facility(); > > - switch (code) { > + switch (code & SCLP_NO_CMD_PARM) {
switch (code & ~SCLP_CMD_PARM) Or are the upper bits parm as well? In fact, what about the upper 32 bits? Alex > case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO: > case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO_FORCED: > read_SCP_info(sccb); > diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h b/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h > index 231a38a..174097d 100644 > --- a/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h > +++ b/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h > @@ -26,6 +26,14 @@ > #define SCLP_CMD_WRITE_EVENT_DATA 0x00760005 > #define SCLP_CMD_WRITE_EVENT_MASK 0x00780005 > > +/* CPU hotplug SCLP codes */ > +#define SCLP_NO_CMD_PARM 0xffff00ff > +#define SCLP_HAS_CPU_INFO 0x0C00000000000000ULL > +#define SCLP_CMDW_READ_CPU_INFO 0x00010001 > +#define SCLP_CMDW_CONFIGURE_CPU 0x00110001 > +#define SCLP_CMDW_DECONFIGURE_CPU 0x00100001 > +#define SCLP_CMDW_CPU_CMD_PARM 0xff00 > + > /* SCLP response codes */ > #define SCLP_RC_NORMAL_READ_COMPLETION 0x0010 > #define SCLP_RC_NORMAL_COMPLETION 0x0020 > -- > 1.7.10.4 >