On 31.07.2013 10:01, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]> writes:
Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is reasonable
to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should ACK by replying
with a Signed-off-by line.
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <[email protected]>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <[email protected]>
Cc: Markus Armbruster <[email protected]>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <[email protected]>
Cc: Jeff Cody <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Lieven <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
In general, I very much prefer to protect my work with a strong copyleft
license like the GPLv2+. However, my contributions to raw.c are
trivial, so I choose to go with the flow in this case.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <[email protected]>
same applies for me.
Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven <[email protected]>