Eric Blake <[email protected]> writes:

> On 07/26/2013 06:39 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  scripts/qapi.py                       | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>  tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py        |  2 ++
>>  tests/qapi-schema/unclosed-string.err |  2 +-
>>  3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>>  
>> +class QAPISchemaError(Exception):
>> +    def __init__(self, schema, msg):
>> +        self.fp = schema.fp
>> +        self.msg = msg
>> +        self.line = self.col = 1
>> +        for ch in schema.src[0:schema.pos]:
>> +            if ch == '\n':
>> +                self.line += 1
>> +                self.col = 1
>> +            elif ch == '\t':
>> +                self.col = (self.col + 7) % 8 + 1
>
> Do we even want to allow TABs in the schema files?  Right now, they are
> tab-free; if you error out here instead of futzing with tab width, we
> could forcefully maintain that property.

I'm not volunteering for the TAB police, but if y'all want the parser to
reject TABs, I can do that.

>> +            else:
>> +                self.col += 1
>
> Does python support ++ as shorthand for += 1?

It doesn't, sadly.

> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <[email protected]>

Reply via email to