On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> wrote: > > However, wouldn't it be nice if we improved the qapi generator to > guarantee a sane default value for optional parameters, even when > has_value is false? >
I'm not a qemu expert or anything, but wouldn't that destroy the point of has_value in the first place? -- Pawit
