Il 16/07/2013 08:47, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
>>
>> @@ -2977,7 +2977,11 @@ static int64_t coroutine_fn
>> bdrv_co_get_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs,
>> if (!bs->drv->bdrv_co_get_block_status) {
>> *pnum = nb_sectors;
>> - return BDRV_BLOCK_DATA;
>> + ret = BDRV_BLOCK_DATA;
>> + if (bs->drv->protocol_name) {
>> + ret |= BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID | (sector_num *
>> BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE);
>> + }
>> + return ret;
>> }
>> ret = bs->drv->bdrv_co_get_block_status(bs, sector_num,
>> nb_sectors, pnum);
> I am curious if this is right. Doesn't this mean we say that at offset
> sector_num * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE are nb_sectors of linear data? This is
> something we do not know for sure.
Only for protocols. In this case, we do know, or format=raw wouldn't
work. This is not propagated up to the actual BDS for the image, except
for format=raw.
Paolo
