Hi Peter, On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 10 July 2013 05:22, <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> wrote: >> From: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> >> >> Allow for defining const opaque data in ARM CP register definitions by >> setting .opaque = foo. If non null opaque is passes into >> define_one_arm_cp_reg_with_opaque then that opaque will take >> precedence, otherwise if null opaque is passed, the original opaque >> data will be used. > > This doesn't seem to have any motivating use in later > patches in the series, or did I miss it? I guess being able > to have the opaque data in the data-tables is nice, though. >
No on-list motivation but I thought I might send this through to get opinion on its validity before I start relying on it out of tree. Regards, peter > thanks > -- PMM >
