Il 30/04/2013 14:16, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
>
> The patch version committed has an additional change in this file:
>
> @@ -88,7 +88,6 @@ static void pc_init1(MemoryRegion *system_memory,
> void *fw_cfg = NULL;
>
> pc_cpus_init(cpu_model);
> - pc_acpi_init("acpi-dsdt.aml");
>
> if (kvmclock_enabled) {
> kvmclock_create();
>
> Was that accidental? Noticed because of a conflict with Igor's patches.
Yes, it must have been introduced when applying, because this wasn't a
pull request. I'll send a patch to revert.
> Further, my Reviewed-by is missing on patch 1/8, so was maybe the
> previous RFC version committed accidentally instead of this one?
No, the RFC only had 6 patches and patches 6-7-8 were completely
different (and broken).
Paolo
