On 20 November 2012 23:52, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) <[email protected]> wrote: > When tb_remove was first commited at fd6ce8f6, there were three different > calls pass different names to offsetof. In current codebase, the other two > calls are replaced with tb_page_remove. There is no need to have a general > tb_remove. Omit passing the third parameter and using tb1->phys_hash_next > directly. > > Signed-off-by: Chen Wei-Ren <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <[email protected]> -- PMM
