On 10/24/2012 04:15 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 03:39:35PM +0530, Avik Sil wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Avik Sil <[email protected]>
>
> As Anthony suggests, it would be better to explicitly remove the
> normal default boot order in this patch, after adding it for
> absolutely everything in the first patch.
>
> This also needs a better patch comment, explaining the significance of
> the presence/absence of the property on firmware behaviour.
>
Sure. Shall I make the boot order for pseries as NULL string or empty
string? Current patch handles NULL string.
Regards,
Avik
>> ---
>> hw/spapr.c | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/spapr.c b/hw/spapr.c
>> index 637b3fb..1b2340c 100644
>> --- a/hw/spapr.c
>> +++ b/hw/spapr.c
>> @@ -283,7 +283,9 @@ static void *spapr_create_fdt_skel(const char *cpu_model,
>>
>> _FDT((fdt_property(fdt, "qemu,boot-kernel", &kprop,
>> sizeof(kprop))));
>> }
>> - _FDT((fdt_property_string(fdt, "qemu,boot-device", boot_device)));
>> + if (boot_device) {
>> + _FDT((fdt_property_string(fdt, "qemu,boot-device", boot_device)));
>> + }
>> _FDT((fdt_property_cell(fdt, "qemu,graphic-width", graphic_width)));
>> _FDT((fdt_property_cell(fdt, "qemu,graphic-height", graphic_height)));
>> _FDT((fdt_property_cell(fdt, "qemu,graphic-depth", graphic_depth)));
>
