On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 02:16:48PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > Now that the sparc tcg backend has finally had guest-base support > added, we can declare that it is mandatory. This lets us (a) > drop the configure script support for a host CPU type not actually > supporting guest-base (b) remove the now unnecessary compile time > check for whether the TCG backend supports guest-base. > > A possible future Part II would be to make guest-base mandatory > for the -user targets (rather than merely the default, as now). > That is, we could drop CONFIG_USER_GUEST_BASE. Does anybody have > a practical use case for the --disable-guest-base configuration? > > Peter Maydell (2): > configure: Remove unnecessary host_guest_base code > tcg: Remove TCG_TARGET_HAS_GUEST_BASE define > > configure | 31 ++----------------------------- > tcg/arm/tcg-target.h | 2 -- > tcg/hppa/tcg-target.h | 2 -- > tcg/i386/tcg-target.h | 2 -- > tcg/ia64/tcg-target.h | 3 --- > tcg/mips/tcg-target.h | 3 --- > tcg/ppc/tcg-target.h | 2 -- > tcg/ppc64/tcg-target.h | 1 - > tcg/s390/tcg-target.h | 2 -- > tcg/sparc/tcg-target.h | 2 -- > tcg/tcg.c | 4 ---- > tcg/tci/tcg-target.h | 3 --- > 12 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-) >
Both patches: Reviewed-by: Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> I think they should go through the linux-user branch. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 [email protected] http://www.aurel32.net
