On 10/04/2012 04:16 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]> writes:
> 
>> Il 03/10/2012 18:03, Avi Kivity ha scritto:
>>> Most of the work on the memory API focused on memory access targets - the 
>>> memory regions
>>> and how they are composed into an address space.  This patchset tackles the 
>>> initator
>>> side of the question - how to originate accesses.
>>> 
>>> The AddressSpace object, is exported to users and becomes the 
>>> representation of an
>>> initiator.  Each address space describes the paths from some point in the 
>>> system
>>> (a device or cpu) to the devices reachable from that initiator.
>>> 
>>> As an example, the API is used to support PCI_COMMAND_MASTER bit.
>>
>> Very nice, IMHO patches 1-18 should get in soon.  They are a useful
>> cleanup on their own.
> 
> Yup, other than a few minor cosmetics, the series is a very nice
> cleanup.
> 
> I think this probably gets us fairly close to being able to write unit
> tests for the memory layer too which is really nice.

It still hardcodes the call to address_space_init_dispatch().  But I
guess we don't have to be purists and we can have the test framework
supply an alternate version of this function.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

Reply via email to