Le Wednesday 15 Aug 2012 à 14:58:45 (-0300), Luiz Capitulino a écrit : > On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:54:24 +0200 > "Benoît Canet" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Benoit Canet <[email protected]> > > --- > > qapi-schema.json | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/qapi-schema.json b/qapi-schema.json > > index a92adb1..8d4df19 100644 > > --- a/qapi-schema.json > > +++ b/qapi-schema.json > > @@ -126,6 +126,30 @@ > > 'running', 'save-vm', 'shutdown', 'suspended', 'watchdog' ] } > > > > ## > > +# @SnapshotInfo > > +# > > +# @id: unique snapshot id > > +# > > +# @name: user choosen name > > +# > > +# @vm-state-size: size of the VM state > > +# > > +# @date-sec: UTC date of the snapshot > > +# > > +# @date-nsec: date in nano seconds > > +# > > +# @vm-clock-sec: VM clock relative to boot > > +# > > +# Since: 1.3 > > +# > > +## > > + > > +{ 'type': 'SnapshotInfo', > > + 'data': { 'id': 'str', 'name': 'str', 'vm-state-size': 'int', > > + 'date-sec': 'int', 'date-nsec': 'int', > > + 'vm-clock-sec': 'int' } } > > Can I assume that this matches with what should be returned by the (hopefully > not so distant) future query-snapshots command? These are the field of the struture in block.h. yet I don't know if it answer correctly to the question :)
> > > + > > +## > > # @StatusInfo: > > # > > # Information about VCPU run state > >
