Am 25.06.2012 16:54, schrieb Peter Maydell: > On 25 June 2012 15:43, Andreas Färber <[email protected]> wrote: >> Am 25.06.2012 16:10, schrieb Peter Maydell: >>> On 25 June 2012 14:48, Andreas Färber <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Thus I would suggest TARGET_PRIdPHYSADDR, also addressing Eric's >>>> comment. Judging from patches 2-4 it's not used to frequently unlike its >>>> user TARGET_FMT_plx, so we don't have to badly shorten it for usability. >>> >>> The hope is that it is used more extensively in the future (ie >>> any device that would have used TARGET_FMT_plx should use these >>> instead); I think TARGET_PRIdPHYSADDR is too long. >> >> Well, PRI*PHYSADDR would be another option, reasoning: >> target_ | phys_addr | _t --- int_ | least64 | _t (PRI*LEAST64) >> Or maybe PRI*PHYS since int is dropped, too? >> >> Point is, POSIX keeps the part after PRIx readable or at least >> corresponding to the type name > > Right. How about TARGET_PRI*PHYS, then?
Fine with me. /-F -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
