On Tue, 3 Mar 2026 at 22:22, Bernhard Beschow <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Rather than requiring users of TYPE_SERIAL to initialize the MMIO region
> themselves, make it generic enough to be configured via properties. This
> makes TYPE_SERIAL more self-contained and prepares it for being turned
> into a SysBusDevice.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Beschow <[email protected]>
> ---
>  include/hw/char/serial-mm.h |  3 --
>  include/hw/char/serial.h    |  4 +-
>  hw/char/diva-gsp.c          |  5 ---
>  hw/char/serial-isa.c        |  1 -
>  hw/char/serial-mm.c         | 51 -------------------------
>  hw/char/serial-pci-multi.c  |  5 ---
>  hw/char/serial-pci.c        |  1 -
>  hw/char/serial.c            | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  8 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)



This does leave TYPE_SERIAL_MM a bit of a do-nothing
extra wrapper, as Balaton says. However I don't think
it's being used by any versioned machine types, so we
could maybe look after this at the possibility of dropping
the wrapper (by having serial_mm_init() create a TYPE_SERIAL
directly, and dropping TYPE_SERIAL_MM entirely). I don't
think we strictly need to do that, though -- being able
to clean up the reset handling here is worthwhile in
itself.

I do have one question:

> +    memory_region_init_io(&s->io, OBJECT(s),
> +                          s->regshift ? &serial_mm_ops[s->endianness]
> +                                      : &serial_io_ops,
> +                          s, "serial", 8 << s->regshift);

This means that users of serial_mm_init() which pass 0 for
regshift now get serial_io_ops rather than serial_mm_ops.
That affects a handful of machines. I'm not sure if
this makes a guest-visible difference (very possibly not),
but for a "refactoring" type patch like this I'd rather
err on the safe side and keep the same MemoryRegionOps
if we can. This could be awkward, though, because we
definitely have users of TYPE_SERIAL_MM which rely on
the default regshift property value being 0. Maybe we
can have the handful of places that want the serial_io_ops
do an explicit setting of some property to request that?

The other approach is to analyse the code and satisfy
ourselves that serial_io_ops and serial_mm_ops with
regshift == 0 really do have exactly identical behaviour,
and note that in the commit message.

thanks
-- PMM

Reply via email to