> On 17. Feb 2026, at 22:08, Osama Abdelkader <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> In whpx_get_registers and whpx_set_registers the loops over FP registers
> were using whpx_reg_match[i].reg instead of whpx_fpreg_match[i].reg
> 
> Signed-off-by: Osama Abdelkader <[email protected]>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Mohamed Mediouni <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>>

Thank you,
> target/arm/whpx/whpx-all.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/arm/whpx/whpx-all.c b/target/arm/whpx/whpx-all.c
> index b0602266af..40ada2d5b6 100644
> --- a/target/arm/whpx/whpx-all.c
> +++ b/target/arm/whpx/whpx-all.c
> @@ -554,7 +554,7 @@ void whpx_get_registers(CPUState *cpu)
>     }
> 
>     for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(whpx_fpreg_match); i++) {
> -        whpx_get_reg(cpu, whpx_reg_match[i].reg, &val);
> +        whpx_get_reg(cpu, whpx_fpreg_match[i].reg, &val);
>         memcpy((char *)env + whpx_fpreg_match[i].offset, &val, 
> sizeof(val.Reg128));
>     }
> 
> @@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ void whpx_set_registers(CPUState *cpu, int level)
> 
>     for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(whpx_fpreg_match); i++) {
>         memcpy(&val.Reg128, (char *)env + whpx_fpreg_match[i].offset, 
> sizeof(val.Reg128));
> -        whpx_set_reg(cpu, whpx_reg_match[i].reg, val);
> +        whpx_set_reg(cpu, whpx_fpreg_match[i].reg, val);
>     }
> 
>     clean_whv_register_value(&val);
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

Reply via email to