On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 03:30:06PM +0800, Zhao Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 09:56:08AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 09:56:08 +0000
> > From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/21] hw/core/qdev-properties: allow qdev
> >  properties accept flags
> > 
> > On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 11:23:41AM +0800, Zhao Liu wrote:
> > > Update qdev property interfaces (qdev_property_add_static() and
> > > qdev_class_add_property()) to accept and pass 'ObjectPropertyFlags'.
> > > This enables marking qdev properties with flags such as DEPRECATED or
> > > INTERNAL.
> > > 
> > > To facilitate this at the definition level, extend the boolean and
> > > uint8_t property macros (as the examples) to accept variable arguments
> > > (VA_ARGS). This allows callers to optionally specify flags in the
> > > property definition.
> > > 
> > > Example:
> > > 
> > > DEFINE_PROP_UINT8("version", IOAPICCommonState, version, IOAPIC_VER_DEF,
> > >                   .flags = OBJECT_PROPERTY_DEPRECATED),
> > 
> > In other places where we track deprecation in QEMU, we have not used
> > a boolean flag. Instead we have used a "const char *deprecation_note"
> > internally, which lets us provide a user facing message, to be printed
> > out in the warn_report, informing them what to do instead (either the
> > feature is entirely removed, or there is a better alternative). IMHO
> > we should be following the same pattern for properties, as it is much
> > more user friendly than just printing a totally generic message
> > "XXXX is deprecated, stop using it" 
> 
> Yes, rich deprecation hint is better. I think this still depends on
> USER_SET - distinguish internal/external or not :-(.
> 
> Since when we mark a property as deprecated, its code remains in the
> code tree, and internal calls should not trigger warnings. Deprecation
> hints are intended to reminder external users.

This depends on where you put the deprecation check. IIUC, all the user
facing codepaths for setting properties end up calling through
object_set_properties_from_qdict, but internal codepaths don't use that.

That method can check & emit the deprecation warnings, without us needing
any explicit tracking of "user set" - the use context is derived from the
codepath


With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|


Reply via email to