On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 09:32:02AM +0100, Oliver Steffen wrote: > Some firmwares provide a virtual (emulated) TPM device to the guest. > Add a corresponding "vtpm" item to the FirmwareFeature enum to reflect > that.
I'm wondering whenever it makes sense to be more specific here, i.e. pick 'svsm-vtpm' as name, or even 'svsm-vtpm-ephemeral'. Specifically because a (future) vtpm with persistence has some additional requirements such as some storage device for svsm, so libvirt needs to know those details ... take care, Gerd
