On Mon, 2025-12-01 at 16:05 +0100, Babis Chalios wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-12-01 at 14:27 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > That's exactly what we *don't* want, and why we say that the canonical
> > definition of this structure is the actual specification. There's no
> > need for QEMU to only ever follow Linux.
> > 
> > In that case, probably best *not* to use the Linux header and instead
> > to build our own specifically for QEMU based on the specification.
> 
> I can do that for v1!
> 
> > It can be almost byte-for-byte identical
> 
> Why "almost", though?

Well, the SPDX tag probably changes at least? And don't we change the
Linux __leXX types to proper C99 types as we import?

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to