On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 11:07:06AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > Well that's because e.g. kvmtest actually depends on pci-testdev. > > IOW it's actually supported. > > This again just sounds like a downstream 'support' rationalization. > I'm still not seeing a compelling reason why the vhost user generic > device should be disabled by default in upstream, especially if we > mark it as an experimental device with an x- prefix. > > With regards, > Daniel
We can do that. I am still somewhat puzzled by whether making it unsupported/experimental addresses the actual need, which seems to be to expose it to end users? Once something is used in the field, we can't take it back whether we added x- to the name or not. What are your thoughts if it's not marked as experimental? -- MST
