On Wed, Oct 1, 2025 at 4:24 PM Andrew Jeffery <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2025-09-25 at 00:58 +0000, Coco Li wrote: > > From: Felix Wu <[email protected]> > > > > Added 32 bits property for ASPEED GPIO. Previously it can only be access in > > bitwise manner. > > > > This change gives ASPEED similar behavior as Nuvoton. > > I don't think this has adequately addressed my request on the prior > series: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/e244fdb5d2d889674a583df8f8b9bc4bf8d476f4.ca...@codeconstruct.com.au/ > > Can you please improve the commit message? > > I don't have any particular concern with the implementation, other than > understanding whether it's something that's reasonable to add to begin > with. The "sets" and their indexes are somewhat an implementation > detail. Exposing them might preclude a different implementation design, > though I'm also not sure why we'd change at this point. > > Andrew >
Hello Andrew, To confirm that I understand your request, I should do the following: 1) remove the reference to Nuvoton behavior in the ASPEED patches (will do in follow up) 2) you asked for discussion of complex simulations, is the addition in the cover patch sufficient? Otherwise, could you elaborate on your comment here on what I can help provide please? Best, Coco > > > > Signed-off-by: Felix Wu <[email protected]> > > --- > > hw/gpio/aspeed_gpio.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/hw/gpio/aspeed_gpio.c b/hw/gpio/aspeed_gpio.c > > index 609a556908..2d78bf9515 100644 > > --- a/hw/gpio/aspeed_gpio.c > > +++ b/hw/gpio/aspeed_gpio.c > > @@ -1308,6 +1308,57 @@ static void aspeed_gpio_2700_write(void *opaque, > > hwaddr offset, > > } > > > > /* Setup functions */ > > +static void aspeed_gpio_set_set(Object *obj, Visitor *v, > > + const char *name, void *opaque, > > + Error **errp) > > +{ > > + uint32_t set_val = 0; > > + AspeedGPIOState *s = ASPEED_GPIO(obj); > > + AspeedGPIOClass *agc = ASPEED_GPIO_GET_CLASS(s); > > + int set_idx = 0; > > + > > + if (!visit_type_uint32(v, name, &set_val, errp)) { > > + return; > > + } > > + > > + if (sscanf(name, "gpio-set[%d]", &set_idx) != 1) { > > + error_setg(errp, "%s: error reading %s", __func__, name); > > + return; > > + } > > + > > + if (set_idx >= agc->nr_gpio_sets || set_idx < 0) { > > + error_setg(errp, "%s: invalid set_idx %s", __func__, name); > > + return; > > + } > > + > > + aspeed_gpio_update(s, &s->sets[set_idx], set_val, > > + ~s->sets[set_idx].direction); > > +} > > + > > +static void aspeed_gpio_get_set(Object *obj, Visitor *v, > > + const char *name, void *opaque, > > + Error **errp) > > +{ > > + uint32_t set_val = 0; > > + AspeedGPIOState *s = ASPEED_GPIO(obj); > > + AspeedGPIOClass *agc = ASPEED_GPIO_GET_CLASS(s); > > + int set_idx = 0; > > + > > + if (sscanf(name, "gpio-set[%d]", &set_idx) != 1) { > > + error_setg(errp, "%s: error reading %s", __func__, name); > > + return; > > + } > > + > > + if (set_idx >= agc->nr_gpio_sets || set_idx < 0) { > > + error_setg(errp, "%s: invalid set_idx %s", __func__, name); > > + return; > > + } > > + > > + set_val = s->sets[set_idx].data_value; > > + visit_type_uint32(v, name, &set_val, errp); > > +} > > + > > +/****************** Setup functions ******************/ > > static const GPIOSetProperties ast2400_set_props[ASPEED_GPIO_MAX_NR_SETS] > > = { > > [0] = {0xffffffff, 0xffffffff, {"A", "B", "C", "D"} }, > > [1] = {0xffffffff, 0xffffffff, {"E", "F", "G", "H"} }, > > @@ -1435,6 +1486,12 @@ static void aspeed_gpio_init(Object *obj) > > g_free(name); > > } > > } > > + > > + for (int i = 0; i < agc->nr_gpio_sets; i++) { > > + char *name = g_strdup_printf("gpio-set[%d]", i); > > + object_property_add(obj, name, "uint32", aspeed_gpio_get_set, > > + aspeed_gpio_set_set, NULL, NULL); > > + } > > } > > > > static const VMStateDescription vmstate_gpio_regs = {
