On Mon, 22 Sept 2025 at 12:32, Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]> wrote: > > I do not think that anyone knows how to demonstrate "clarity of the > copyright status in relation to training".
Yes; to me this is the whole driving force behind the policy. > On the other hand, AI tools can be used as a natural language refactoring > engine for simple tasks such as modifying all callers of a given function > or even less simple ones such as adding Python type annotations. > These tasks have a very low risk of introducing training material in > the code base, and can provide noticeable time savings because they are > easily tested and reviewed; for the lack of a better term, I will call > these "tasks with limited or non-existing creative content". Does anybody know how to demonstrate "limited or non-existing creative content", which I assume is a standin here for "not copyrightable" ? -- PMM
