On 9/3/25 15:01, Max Chou wrote:
+#define OPMVX_VQDOTQ(NAME, TD, T1, T2, TX1, TX2, HD, HS1, HS2)          \
+static void do_##NAME(void *vd, target_long s1, void *vs2, int i)       \
+{                                                                       \
+    int idx;                                                            \
+    T1 r1;                                                              \
+    T2 r2;                                                              \
+    TX1 *r1_buf = (TX1 *)&s1;                                           \
+    TX2 *r2_buf = (TX2 *)vs2 + HD(i);                                   \
+    TD acc = ((TD *)vd)[HD(i)];                                         \
+                                                                        \
+    for (idx = 0; idx < 4; ++idx) {                                     \
+        r1 = *((T1 *)r1_buf + HS1(idx));                                \
+        r2 = *((T2 *)r2_buf + HS2(idx));                                \
+        acc += r1 * r2;                                                 \

One could argue for a missing widening cast to TD here. You got away with it because the only uses happen to have small inputs and "int" sized outputs, so C arithmetic promotion worked for you.

You can move the variable declarations into the loop.


r~

Reply via email to