On Thu, Aug 07, 2025 at 12:35:39PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 8/6/25 21:13, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > It is best to have new functionality added in a separate commit > > from the removal of obsolete code. > > My mistake - when Tanish and I "un-rebased" these patches from on top of > yours, we placed the removal of the "nocheck" functions in patch 1 instead > of patch 2 where it made more sense. > > > I've co-incidentally got removal of this obsolete code in the > > tracing test suite series I posted, so one will need to be > > rebased on top of the other, depending on what order Stefan > > wants to take the patches. > > If the main blocker (the /dev/stdout issue) is fixed quickly, your patches > should go in first because they aid in reviewing this one.
I posted a new version that drops the stdout patch https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2025-08/msg02716.html With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
