>-----Original Message-----
>From: Cédric Le Goater <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 18/20] vfio: Add a new element bypass_ro in
>VFIOContainerBase
>
>On 7/29/25 11:20, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
>> When bypass_ro is true, read only memory section is bypassed from
>> mapping in the container.
>>
>> This is a preparing patch to workaround Intel ERRATA_772415.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>   include/hw/vfio/vfio-container-base.h |  1 +
>>   hw/vfio/listener.c                    | 13 +++++++++----
>>   2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/hw/vfio/vfio-container-base.h
>b/include/hw/vfio/vfio-container-base.h
>> index bded6e993f..31fd784d76 100644
>> --- a/include/hw/vfio/vfio-container-base.h
>> +++ b/include/hw/vfio/vfio-container-base.h
>> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ typedef struct VFIOContainerBase {
>>       QLIST_HEAD(, VFIODevice) device_list;
>>       GList *iova_ranges;
>>       NotifierWithReturn cpr_reboot_notifier;
>> +    bool bypass_ro;
>>   } VFIOContainerBase;
>>
>>   typedef struct VFIOGuestIOMMU {
>> diff --git a/hw/vfio/listener.c b/hw/vfio/listener.c
>> index f498e23a93..c64aa4539e 100644
>> --- a/hw/vfio/listener.c
>> +++ b/hw/vfio/listener.c
>> @@ -364,7 +364,8 @@ static bool
>vfio_known_safe_misalignment(MemoryRegionSection *section)
>>       return true;
>>   }
>>
>> -static bool vfio_listener_valid_section(MemoryRegionSection *section,
>> +static bool vfio_listener_valid_section(VFIOContainerBase *bcontainer,
>> +                                        MemoryRegionSection
>*section,
>>                                           const char *name)
>
>Instead of adding a 'VFIOContainerBase *' argument, I would add an
>extra 'bool bypass_ro' argument.

Done, see 
https://github.com/yiliu1765/qemu/commit/b0be8bfc9a899334819f3f4f0704e47116944a53

Opportunistically, I also introduced another patch to bypass dirty tracking for 
readonly region, see 
https://github.com/yiliu1765/qemu/commit/a21ce0afd8aec5d5a9e6de46cf46757530cb7d9f

Thanks
Zhenzhong

Reply via email to