On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 12:52:29 +0100
Alireza Sanaee via <qemu-devel@nongnu.org> wrote:

> OS like Linux is using PPTT processor node's identical implementation
> flag [1] to infer whether the whole system or a certain CPU cluster is
> homogeneous or not [2]. QEMU currently only support building
> homogeneous system, set the flag to indicate the fact. Build a root
> node in PPTT for indicates the identical implementation which is
> needed for a multi-socket system. Update the related PPTT tables as
> well.
> 
> We observed an issue interacting with Loongarch with this patchset,
> and there was a discussion about it in [3], and eventually thanks to
> Bibo we have a patchset that fixed the interactions with Loongarch in
> the [4].
> 
> History:
>     * v5->v6: Rebased on 09be8a511a2e278b45729d7b065d30c68dd699d0
>     * v4->v5: fixed a typo
>     * v3->v4: PPTT rev to 2
>     * v2->v3: rebase to 10
> 
> [1] ACPI 6.5 Table 5.158: Processor Structure Flags
> [2] 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/acpi/pptt.c?h=v6.11-rc1#n810
> [3] 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/99a37f40-56dc-ab7a-86ff-1a9dcb3cc...@loongson.cn/
> [4] 
> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20250604065502.1114098-1-maob...@loongson.cn/
> 
> DEPEND-ON: Message-ID: <20250604065502.1114098-1-maob...@loongson.cn>
> 
> Yicong Yang (4):
>   tests: virt: Allow changes to PPTT test table
>   hw/acpi/aml-build: Set identical implementation flag for PPTT
>     processor nodes
>   hw/acpi/aml-build: Build a root node in the PPTT table
>   tests: virt: Update expected ACPI tables for virt test
> 
>  hw/acpi/aml-build.c                           |  24
> +++++++++++++++--- tests/data/acpi/aarch64/virt/PPTT             |
> Bin 76 -> 96 bytes .../data/acpi/aarch64/virt/PPTT.acpihmatvirt  |
> Bin 156 -> 176 bytes tests/data/acpi/aarch64/virt/PPTT.topology    |
> Bin 336 -> 356 bytes 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 

Hi Michael,

Just a reminder on this set. Hope this time it is OK with Loongarch.

Thanks,
Alireza

Reply via email to