On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 14:35:18 +0200
Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com>
The wide range of ways setting variant up is coded in this file is
a bit more creative than I'd like and makes it hard to spot if there
are other cases of this. I 'think' this is only one other than
base tests that has this problem but might be wrong.
Anyhow, this looks right
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.came...@huawei.com>
> ---
> tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c b/tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c
> index 4dbc07ec5e..357bcefd37 100644
> --- a/tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c
> +++ b/tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c
> @@ -2237,6 +2237,7 @@ static void test_acpi_aarch64_virt_viot(void)
> test_data data = {
> .machine = "virt",
> .arch = "aarch64",
> + .variant = ".viot",
> .tcg_only = true,
> .uefi_fl1 = "pc-bios/edk2-aarch64-code.fd",
> .uefi_fl2 = "pc-bios/edk2-arm-vars.fd",
