On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 12:02:25 +0200 Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > > As you've said in comment > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322713#c6 > > it's strange that patch causes issues at all, especially with > > '-smp 1' as in reproducer. > > > > Also repeated with -smp x>1, it still worked fine. > > > > Perhaps issue was elsewhere after all. > > Yea, looks pretty much like this. Guess we do not need the > 'make only read access lockless' part then. Yep, I'll ditch readonly and instead add proper fine-grained locking to PM and HPET timers instead (HPET needs it anyways as Peter pointed out, while PM will be just a collateral) > > take care, > Gerd >
