Hi Igor, Jonathan,

On 6/20/25 2:27 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 10:19:36 +0100
> Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.came...@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 11:46:45 +0200
>> Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Move aml_pci_edsm to pci-bridge.c since we want to reuse that for
>>> ARM and acpi-index support.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com>  
>> A request for a bit of documentation inline.  aml_pci_edsm() sounds
>> like we should be able to grep the spec for edsm and find it but
>> that's just internal method naming in qemu.
> agree, aml_ prefix is typically reserved for ACPI spec items. 
renamed into build_pci_bridge_edsm()

Thanks

Eric
>
> perhaps rename it to follow build_ prefix scheme?
>
>>
>> More interesting is I don't think this will ever be called as
>> the kernel has no idea how to call it and unlike on x86 the
>> blobs don't show wrapping the call in a _DSM() (see 
>> aml_pci_static_endpoint_dsm())
>>
>> Did EDSM usage get dropped as this set evolved leaving this behind?
>>
>>
>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> v2 -> v3:
>>> - move to pci-bridge.c instead of pcihp.c (Igor)
>>> ---
>>>  include/hw/acpi/pci.h |  1 +
>>>  hw/acpi/pci-bridge.c  | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  hw/i386/acpi-build.c  | 53 ------------------------------------------
>>>  3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/pci.h b/include/hw/acpi/pci.h
>>> index 69bae95eac..05e72815c8 100644
>>> --- a/include/hw/acpi/pci.h
>>> +++ b/include/hw/acpi/pci.h
>>> @@ -42,5 +42,6 @@ void build_pci_bridge_aml(AcpiDevAmlIf *adev, Aml *scope);
>>>  void build_srat_generic_affinity_structures(GArray *table_data);
>>>  
>>>  Aml *build_pci_host_bridge_osc_method(bool enable_native_pcie_hotplug);
>>> +Aml *aml_pci_edsm(void);
>>>  
>>>  #endif
>>> diff --git a/hw/acpi/pci-bridge.c b/hw/acpi/pci-bridge.c
>>> index 7baa7034a1..be68a98c34 100644
>>> --- a/hw/acpi/pci-bridge.c
>>> +++ b/hw/acpi/pci-bridge.c
>>> @@ -35,3 +35,57 @@ void build_pci_bridge_aml(AcpiDevAmlIf *adev, Aml *scope)
>>>          }
>>>      }
>>>  }
>>> +
>>> +Aml *aml_pci_edsm(void)  
>> Can we have some comments, or a more descriptive name than
>> the resulting method name?  There is stuff in the function obviously
>> that associates it with the naming DSM but given this is moving to
>> generic code maybe it needs a brief intro comment?
>>
>>
>>> +{
>>> +    Aml *method, *ifctx;
>>> +    Aml *zero = aml_int(0);
>>> +    Aml *func = aml_arg(2);
>>> +    Aml *ret = aml_local(0);
>>> +    Aml *aidx = aml_local(1);
>>> +    Aml *params = aml_arg(4);
>>> +
>>> +    method = aml_method("EDSM", 5, AML_SERIALIZED);
>>> +
>>> +    /* get supported functions */
>>> +    ifctx = aml_if(aml_equal(func, zero));
>>> +    {
>>> +        /* 1: have supported functions */
>>> +        /* 7: support for function 7 */
>>> +        const uint8_t caps = 1 | BIT(7);
>>> +        build_append_pci_dsm_func0_common(ifctx, ret);
>>> +        aml_append(ifctx, aml_store(aml_int(caps), aml_index(ret, zero)));
>>> +        aml_append(ifctx, aml_return(ret));
>>> +    }
>>> +    aml_append(method, ifctx);
>>> +
>>> +    /* handle specific functions requests */
>>> +    /*
>>> +     * PCI Firmware Specification 3.1
>>> +     * 4.6.7. _DSM for Naming a PCI or PCI Express Device Under
>>> +     *        Operating Systems
>>> +     */
>>> +    ifctx = aml_if(aml_equal(func, aml_int(7)));
>>> +    {
>>> +       Aml *pkg = aml_package(2);
>>> +       aml_append(pkg, zero);
>>> +       /* optional, if not impl. should return null string */
>>> +       aml_append(pkg, aml_string("%s", ""));
>>> +       aml_append(ifctx, aml_store(pkg, ret));
>>> +
>>> +       /*
>>> +        * IASL is fine when initializing Package with computational data,
>>> +        * however it makes guest unhappy /it fails to process such AML/.
>>> +        * So use runtime assignment to set acpi-index after initializer
>>> +        * to make OSPM happy.
>>> +        */
>>> +       aml_append(ifctx,
>>> +           aml_store(aml_derefof(aml_index(params, aml_int(0))), aidx));
>>> +       aml_append(ifctx, aml_store(aidx, aml_index(ret, zero)));
>>> +       aml_append(ifctx, aml_return(ret));
>>> +    }
>>> +    aml_append(method, ifctx);
>>> +
>>> +    return method;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
>>> index fe8bc62c03..6cf623392e 100644
>>> --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
>>> +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
>>> @@ -338,59 +338,6 @@ build_facs(GArray *table_data)
>>>      g_array_append_vals(table_data, reserved, 40); /* Reserved */
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> -static Aml *aml_pci_edsm(void)
>>> -{
>>> -    Aml *method, *ifctx;
>>> -    Aml *zero = aml_int(0);
>>> -    Aml *func = aml_arg(2);
>>> -    Aml *ret = aml_local(0);
>>> -    Aml *aidx = aml_local(1);
>>> -    Aml *params = aml_arg(4);
>>> -
>>> -    method = aml_method("EDSM", 5, AML_SERIALIZED);
>>> -
>>> -    /* get supported functions */
>>> -    ifctx = aml_if(aml_equal(func, zero));
>>> -    {
>>> -        /* 1: have supported functions */
>>> -        /* 7: support for function 7 */
>>> -        const uint8_t caps = 1 | BIT(7);
>>> -        build_append_pci_dsm_func0_common(ifctx, ret);
>>> -        aml_append(ifctx, aml_store(aml_int(caps), aml_index(ret, zero)));
>>> -        aml_append(ifctx, aml_return(ret));
>>> -    }
>>> -    aml_append(method, ifctx);
>>> -
>>> -    /* handle specific functions requests */
>>> -    /*
>>> -     * PCI Firmware Specification 3.1
>>> -     * 4.6.7. _DSM for Naming a PCI or PCI Express Device Under
>>> -     *        Operating Systems
>>> -     */
>>> -    ifctx = aml_if(aml_equal(func, aml_int(7)));
>>> -    {
>>> -       Aml *pkg = aml_package(2);
>>> -       aml_append(pkg, zero);
>>> -       /* optional, if not impl. should return null string */
>>> -       aml_append(pkg, aml_string("%s", ""));
>>> -       aml_append(ifctx, aml_store(pkg, ret));
>>> -
>>> -       /*
>>> -        * IASL is fine when initializing Package with computational data,
>>> -        * however it makes guest unhappy /it fails to process such AML/.
>>> -        * So use runtime assignment to set acpi-index after initializer
>>> -        * to make OSPM happy.
>>> -        */
>>> -       aml_append(ifctx,
>>> -           aml_store(aml_derefof(aml_index(params, aml_int(0))), aidx));
>>> -       aml_append(ifctx, aml_store(aidx, aml_index(ret, zero)));
>>> -       aml_append(ifctx, aml_return(ret));
>>> -    }
>>> -    aml_append(method, ifctx);
>>> -
>>> -    return method;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>>  /*
>>>   * build_prt - Define interrupt routing rules
>>>   *  


Reply via email to