On 6/12/2025 4:27 PM, Chenyi Qiang wrote:
> Update ReplayRamDiscard() function to return the result and unify the
> ReplayRamPopulate() and ReplayRamDiscard() to ReplayRamDiscardState() at
> the same time due to their identical definitions. This unification
> simplifies related structures, such as VirtIOMEMReplayData, which makes
> it cleaner.
> 
> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gu...@amd.com>
> Reviewed-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qi...@intel.com>
> ---
> Changes in v7:
>     - Add Reviewed-by from Xiaoyao and Pankaj.
> 
> Changes in v6:
>     - Add Reviewed-by from David
>     - Add a documentation comment for the prototype change
> 
> Changes in v5:
>     - Rename ReplayRamStateChange to ReplayRamDiscardState (David)
>     - return data->fn(s, data->opaque) instead of 0 in
>       virtio_mem_rdm_replay_discarded_cb(). (Alexey)
> 
> Changes in v4:
>     - Modify the commit message. We won't use Replay() operation when
>       doing the attribute change like v3.
> ---
>  hw/virtio/virtio-mem.c  | 21 +++++++-------
>  include/system/memory.h | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  migration/ram.c         |  5 ++--
>  system/memory.c         | 12 ++++----
>  4 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 

To fix the build error with --enable-docs configuration, Add the below fixup

======

>From 41bf404651b180f886bd174d36ae62be2b0da61f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qi...@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 10:49:46 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] fixup! memory: Unify the definiton of ReplayRamPopulate() and
 ReplayRamDiscard()

Signed-off-by: Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qi...@intel.com>
---
 include/system/memory.h | 12 +++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/system/memory.h b/include/system/memory.h
index eb2618e1b4..46248d4a52 100644
--- a/include/system/memory.h
+++ b/include/system/memory.h
@@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ static inline void 
ram_discard_listener_init(RamDiscardListener *rdl,
 }
 
 /**
- * ReplayRamDiscardState:
+ * typedef ReplayRamDiscardState:
  *
  * The callback handler for #RamDiscardManagerClass.replay_populated/
  * #RamDiscardManagerClass.replay_discarded to invoke on populated/discarded
@@ -741,6 +741,11 @@ bool ram_discard_manager_is_populated(const 
RamDiscardManager *rdm,
  * A wrapper to call the #RamDiscardManagerClass.replay_populated callback
  * of the #RamDiscardManager.
  *
+ * @rdm: the #RamDiscardManager
+ * @section: the #MemoryRegionSection
+ * @replay_fn: the #ReplayRamDiscardState callback
+ * @opaque: pointer to forward to the callback
+ *
  * Returns 0 on success, or a negative error if any notification failed.
  */
 int ram_discard_manager_replay_populated(const RamDiscardManager *rdm,
@@ -754,6 +759,11 @@ int ram_discard_manager_replay_populated(const 
RamDiscardManager *rdm,
  * A wrapper to call the #RamDiscardManagerClass.replay_discarded callback
  * of the #RamDiscardManager.
  *
+ * @rdm: the #RamDiscardManager
+ * @section: the #MemoryRegionSection
+ * @replay_fn: the #ReplayRamDiscardState callback
+ * @opaque: pointer to forward to the callback
+ *
  * Returns 0 on success, or a negative error if any notification failed.
  */
 int ram_discard_manager_replay_discarded(const RamDiscardManager *rdm,
-- 
2.43.5




Reply via email to