On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 14:22:19 -0400, "Rob Landley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Sunday 24 June 2007 09:13:57 Alexander van Heukelum wrote: > > Hi, > > > > $SUBJECT > > > > At least for me ;), for the latest snapshot of qemu, on Ubuntu 7.04 > > on an AMD Opteron system. > > Yeah, I think that's what I'm seeing too. Could you tell the list > instead of > just me? :) >
Hi all, Well, http://qemu.com/lists.html is down at the moment, so I have no idea if the fix has appeared here yet, but the patch attached to the following Ubuntu bug report fixes the segfault at startup of qemu-i386. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/90660 (patch copy/pasted below, so it will be damaged) --- linux-user/main.c (révision 527) +++ linux-user/main.c (copie de travail) @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ /* for recent libc, we add these dummy symbols which are not declared when generating a linked object (bug in ld ?) */ -#if (__GLIBC__ > 2 || (__GLIBC__ == 2 && __GLIBC_MINOR__ >= 3)) && !defined(CONFIG_STATIC) +#if (__GLIBC__ == 2 && __GLIBC_MINOR__ == 3) && !defined(CONFIG_STATIC) long __preinit_array_start[0]; long __preinit_array_end[0]; long __init_array_start[0]; > Rob > -- > "One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code." > - Ken Thompson. -- Alexander van Heukelum [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Choose from over 50 domains or use your own
