On 27/02/25 08:44, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
On Mon Feb 17, 2025 at 5:17 PM AEST, Aditya Gupta wrote:
According to PAPR:
R1–7.3.30–3. When the platform receives an ibm,os-term RTAS call, or
on a system reset without an ibm,nmi-interlock RTAS call, if the
platform has a dump structure registered through the
ibm,configure-kernel-dump call, the platform must process each
registered kernel dump section as required and, when available,
present the dump structure information to the operating system
through the “ibm,kernel-dump” property, updated with status for each
dump section, until the dump has been invalidated through the
ibm,configure-kernel-dump RTAS call.
If Fadump has been registered, trigger an Fadump boot (memory preserving
boot), if QEMU recieves a 'ibm,os-term' rtas call.
Implementing the fadump boot as:
* pause all vcpus (will save registers later)
* preserve memory regions specified by fadump
* do a memory preserving reboot (GUEST_RESET in QEMU doesn't clear
the memory)
Memory regions registered by fadump will be handled in a later patch.
Signed-off-by: Aditya Gupta <[email protected]>
---
hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
index eebdf13b1552..01c82375f03d 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
@@ -342,6 +342,43 @@ static void rtas_ibm_set_system_parameter(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
}
struct fadump_metadata fadump_metadata;
+bool is_next_boot_fadump;
Here's another one for spapr state.
Sure, will add.
+
+static void trigger_fadump_boot(target_ulong spapr_retcode)
+{
+ /*
+ * In PowerNV, SBE stops all clocks for cores, do similar to it
+ * QEMU's nearest equivalent is 'pause_all_vcpus'
+ * See 'stopClocksS0' in SBE source code for more info on SBE part
+ */
Can probably remove this comment here.
Sure.
+ pause_all_vcpus();
+
+ if (true /* TODO: Preserve memory registered for fadump */) {
If you're adding half the code to preserve memory but never actually
calling it anyway, you don't need the pause_all_vcpus() call either.
Again I would rather not adding unused code to the patches if possible.
If you're really not able to find a nice way to split and add
incrementally then okay, but try to take another look if possible.
Yes all this is unused. Will take another look to see how I can arrange it.
+ /* Failed to preserve the registered memory regions */
+ rtas_st(spapr_retcode, 0, RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR);
+
+ /* Cause a reboot */
+ qemu_system_guest_panicked(NULL);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* Mark next boot as fadump boot */
+ is_next_boot_fadump = true;
+
+ /* Reset fadump_registered for next boot */
+ fadump_metadata.fadump_registered = false;
+ fadump_metadata.fadump_dump_active = true;
+
+ /* Then do a guest reset */
+ /*
+ * Requirement:
+ * This guest reset should not clear the memory (which is
+ * the case when this is merged)
+ */
+ qemu_system_reset_request(SHUTDOWN_CAUSE_GUEST_RESET);
Seems reasonable. What is the actual mechanism that clears the machine
RAM anyway? I'm not able to find it...
I didn't find any too. There is a devices reset which happens at this
guest_reset, during which some devices do clear their memory registers,
eg. 'pnv_psi_reset', since it clears it's regs it's like it's cleared
it's memory region.
There were few like that which cleared the data they pass in their
memory regions, but nothing clearing the whole RAM/whole memory regions
as such.
- Aditya G
Thanks,
Nick
+
+ rtas_st(spapr_retcode, 0, RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS);
+}
/* Papr Section 7.4.9 ibm,configure-kernel-dump RTAS call */
static __attribute((unused)) void rtas_configure_kernel_dump(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
@@ -449,6 +486,11 @@ static void rtas_ibm_os_term(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
target_ulong msgaddr = rtas_ld(args, 0);
char msg[512];
+ if (fadump_metadata.fadump_registered) {
+ /* If fadump boot works, control won't come back here */
+ return trigger_fadump_boot(rets);
+ }
+
cpu_physical_memory_read(msgaddr, msg, sizeof(msg) - 1);
msg[sizeof(msg) - 1] = 0;
