>> Good point. Using s390_get_memory_limit() sounds good to me; That will make >> v3 of this series dependent on the s390x virtio-mem series but sounds like >> you're sending that sometime this week anyway. > > If my testing is good and there are no further comments, I'll queue it > directly (no change to v2) to send it upstream. > > So it's probably a good idea to wait with a new series her. >
OK > > We discussed at some point maybe requiring disabling uncoordinated discarding > of RAM (virtio-balloon), is that already done implicitly now? > Yes, this should be handled via the call to ram_block_uncoordinated_discard_disable() in vfio_ram_block_discard_disable() - I just traced that now to double-check.
