Thanks, Daniel. We'll get this patch updated and send it out again.

> it makes sense to allow for a data structure

Whoops, I misread your original message - data structure SGTM.

On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 11:04 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 03:54:40PM -0500, Andrew Keesler wrote:
> > I follow what you are saying. I misunderstood what a "display" was in the
> > domain of QEMU. Yes, this makes more sense now.
> >
> > > the user should give names for every output at startup
> >
> > I see DEFINE_PROP_ARRAY exists. I can use that to define the new
> "outputs"
> > property. Any reason that each "output" would ever need to be an object
> > (rather than just a string)? Nothing comes to mind, I'm just taking a
> second
> > to think about API forwards compatibility.
>
> Currently we have 'xres' and 'yres' properties set against the device
> for virtio-gpu.
>
> If we're going to extend  it to allow the name of each "output" head
> to be configured, it makes sense to allow for a data structure that
> will let us also cnofigure xres & yres per output.
>
> Hence, I thought it would make more sense to have an array of structs,
> rather than the simpler array of strings, which will let us set any
> amount of per-output config data we might want in future.
>
> NB, I'm not asking you to wire up support for xres/yres per output,
> just that we anticipate it as a possibility.
>
> > > upto whatever they said for "max_outputs"
> >
> > Where is the best place to perform this validation? I would imagine we
> would
> > want to fast-fail if the user provided more "outputs" than
> "max_outputs". I
> > can
> > perform the validation in virtio_gpu_base_get_features but that seems
> late.
>
> I'd suggest putting it in virtio_gpu_base_device_realize, as we already
> have code there to validate 'max_outputs" is within limits.
>
>
> With regards,
> Daniel
> --
> |: https://berrange.com      -o-
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
> |: https://libvirt.org         -o-
> https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
> |: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-
> https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
>
>

Reply via email to