On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 at 22:05, Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouv...@linaro.org> wrote: > > On 11/4/24 07:58, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 at 04:07, Pierrick Bouvier > > <pierrick.bouv...@linaro.org> wrote: > >> > >> MacOS and Linux are straightforward, but Windows needs a bit more > >> details. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouv...@linaro.org> > > > > We have documentation on the wiki currently about how to > > build on various platforms: > > > > https://wiki.qemu.org/Hosts/Linux > > https://wiki.qemu.org/Hosts/Mac > > https://wiki.qemu.org/Hosts/W32 > > > > I agree that we ought to move this into the main documentation. > > Some of the information in those wiki pages is probably > > out of date, but some of it looks like useful extra detail > > that we could incorporate here. > > > > I noticed that. Is the QEMU wiki considered as "deprecated" (no new > information there), or more seen as a complement to current manual?
It's in the usual state of all wikis -- it has a lot of information, some of which is out of date and some of which is still useful, and none of which is particularly well organized. Some of it we should definitely move into our main documentation. > My goal adding this to the documentation was to have a simple (and > single) "how-to" per platform, instead of trying to cover all the > possible details and configuration. > > Would that be acceptable to add links to the wiki instead of adding all > information in our documentation? I think if we want to document the build process in our "real" documentation (which we should) then we should remove the wiki pages (or replace their content with pointers to the docs). Otherwise we just have two places with the same information. If we decide that some of the information on the wiki pages is too stale or too niche to include that's fine. thanks -- PMM
