On 28/10/2024 18:58, Peter Xu wrote:
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments


On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 06:41:42PM +0200, Avihai Horon wrote:
On 28/10/2024 17:45, Peter Xu wrote:
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments


On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 09:43:16AM +0200, Avihai Horon wrote:
On 25/10/2024 0:30, Peter Xu wrote:
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments


We have two outside users of this API, so it's exported.

Is it really necessary?  Does it matter whether it must be
ACTIVE/POSTCOPY_ACTIVE/DEVICE?  I guess no.
Actually for VFIO it does matter, because we don't want VFIO to do DPT
log_sync in SETUP stage when DPT might not have been started yet.
See commit ff180c6bd7a8 ("vfio/migration: Skip log_sync during migration
SETUP state").
This seems to be a known issue for migration in general, rather than VFIO
specific.  Hyman has a patch for it, not yet reviewed..

https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1729648695.git.yong.hu...@smartx.com

That corresponds to your comment here:

      Redundant -- all RAM is marked dirty in migration SETUP state and is
      transferred only after migration is set to ACTIVE state, so doing
      log_sync during migration SETUP is pointless.

So I wonder whether it's only VFIO that should skip it, or log_sync()
simply shouldn't be called at all during SETUP, because of its redundancy.
Not sure why this sync was there in the first place, but if its only purpose
was to sync dirty pages then yes, I guess it be dropped.

The other thing you mentioned here:

      Can fail -- there is a time window, between setting migration state to
      SETUP and starting dirty tracking by RAM save_live_setup handler, during
      which dirty tracking is still not started. Any VFIO log_sync call that
      is issued during this time window will fail. For example, this error can
      be triggered by migrating a VM when a GUI is active, which constantly
      calls log_sync.

This is VFIO specific.  Why this can fail even if global tracking is
started already?
It can fail if global tracking is *not* started yet.
As mentioned in the commit message, there is a time window where migration
is in SETUP state but global tracking is not started yet.
Hmm, I'm totally confused now..

The only thing that can kickoff the sync during SETUP, AFAICT, is:

             ret = memory_global_dirty_log_start(GLOBAL_DIRTY_MIGRATION, errp);
             if (!ret) {
                 goto out_unlock;
             }
             migration_bitmap_sync_precopy(false);   <------------- here

I need to confess this may not be the right place to invoke it in ram.c (I
think we probably should move it out at some point.. into generic migration
code).  However I don't yet see why log_start() is not called first in your
case before log_sync().

Could you elaborate?

Indeed, in the above code log_start is called before log_sync.

I was referring to the case where some other code path triggers log_sync.
E.g., if you open a VNC to the guest then it constantly calls log_sync to refresh the graphics. In that case, one of these log_syncs can happen between "migration status is set to SETUP" and "global tracking is started".

Thanks.

Thanks.

I didn't yet get why a GUI being active in guest could
affect log_sync() from working.. after vfio_listener_log_global_start()
properly setup everything.

Thanks,

Thanks.

The external user is trying to detect whether migration is running or not,
as simple as that.

To make the migration_is*() APIs even shorter, let's use
migration_is_running() for outside worlds.

Internally there're actually three places that literally needs
migration_is_active() rather than running().  Keep that an internal helper.

After this patch, we finally only export one helper that allows external
world to try detect migration status, which is migration_is_running().

Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com>
---
    include/migration/misc.h | 1 -
    migration/migration.h    | 1 +
    hw/vfio/common.c         | 4 ++--
    system/dirtylimit.c      | 3 +--
    4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/migration/misc.h b/include/migration/misc.h
index ad1e25826a..c0e23fdac9 100644
--- a/include/migration/misc.h
+++ b/include/migration/misc.h
@@ -53,7 +53,6 @@ void dump_vmstate_json_to_file(FILE *out_fp);
    void migration_object_init(void);
    void migration_shutdown(void);

-bool migration_is_active(void);
    bool migration_is_running(void);
    bool migration_thread_is_self(void);

diff --git a/migration/migration.h b/migration/migration.h
index 0956e9274b..9fa26ab06a 100644
--- a/migration/migration.h
+++ b/migration/migration.h
@@ -492,6 +492,7 @@ int migration_call_notifiers(MigrationState *s, 
MigrationEventType type,

    int migrate_init(MigrationState *s, Error **errp);
    bool migration_is_blocked(Error **errp);
+bool migration_is_active(void);
    /* True if outgoing migration has entered postcopy phase */
    bool migration_in_postcopy(void);
    bool migration_postcopy_is_alive(MigrationStatus state);
diff --git a/hw/vfio/common.c b/hw/vfio/common.c
index cc72282c71..7eb99ebd4d 100644
--- a/hw/vfio/common.c
+++ b/hw/vfio/common.c
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static bool 
vfio_devices_all_dirty_tracking(VFIOContainerBase *bcontainer)
    {
        VFIODevice *vbasedev;

-    if (!migration_is_active()) {
+    if (!migration_is_running()) {
            return false;
        }

@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ vfio_devices_all_running_and_mig_active(const 
VFIOContainerBase *bcontainer)
    {
        VFIODevice *vbasedev;

-    if (!migration_is_active()) {
+    if (!migration_is_running()) {
            return false;
        }

diff --git a/system/dirtylimit.c b/system/dirtylimit.c
index ab20da34bb..d7a855c603 100644
--- a/system/dirtylimit.c
+++ b/system/dirtylimit.c
@@ -80,8 +80,7 @@ static void vcpu_dirty_rate_stat_collect(void)
        int i = 0;
        int64_t period = DIRTYLIMIT_CALC_TIME_MS;

-    if (migrate_dirty_limit() &&
-        migration_is_active()) {
+    if (migrate_dirty_limit() && migration_is_running()) {
            period = migrate_vcpu_dirty_limit_period();
        }

--
2.45.0

--
Peter Xu

--
Peter Xu


Reply via email to