On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 10:24 AM Michael Tokarev <[email protected]> wrote: > On another hand, these aren't used often these days. This particular > option isn't necessary with windows 2000, at least with two different > kits of it which I have locally. So finding the thing when you actually > need it (if it gets moved elsewhere) will be difficult. > > On yet another, the code to handle this stuff is small enough and does > not require much to maintain, -- at least for now, maybe in future it > will be more difficult.
Yes, I agree. The purpose of these patches is to keep the implementation of the options separate from the implementation of the workaround, and that makes things even simpler. Paolo
