On 11/3/23 12:59, Alex Bennée wrote:
--- a/plugins/api.c
+++ b/plugins/api.c
@@ -89,7 +89,11 @@ void qemu_plugin_register_vcpu_tb_exec_cb(struct
qemu_plugin_tb *tb,
void *udata)
{
if (!tb->mem_only) {
- plugin_register_dyn_cb__udata(&tb->cbs[PLUGIN_CB_REGULAR],
+ int index = flags == QEMU_PLUGIN_CB_R_REGS ||
+ flags == QEMU_PLUGIN_CB_RW_REGS ?
+ PLUGIN_CB_REGULAR_R : PLUGIN_CB_REGULAR;
+
I'd really rather you reject QEMU_PLUGIN_CB_RW_REGS entirely, rather than implement it
with incorrect semantics.
Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <[email protected]>
+ plugin_register_dyn_cb__udata(&tb->cbs[index],
cb, flags, udata);
}
}
@@ -109,7 +113,11 @@ void qemu_plugin_register_vcpu_insn_exec_cb(struct
qemu_plugin_insn *insn,
void *udata)
{
if (!insn->mem_only) {
-
plugin_register_dyn_cb__udata(&insn->cbs[PLUGIN_CB_INSN][PLUGIN_CB_REGULAR],
+ int index = flags == QEMU_PLUGIN_CB_R_REGS ||
+ flags == QEMU_PLUGIN_CB_RW_REGS ?
+ PLUGIN_CB_REGULAR_R : PLUGIN_CB_REGULAR;
+
+ plugin_register_dyn_cb__udata(&insn->cbs[PLUGIN_CB_INSN][index],
cb, flags, udata);
}
}