Hello Philippe,

Changes suggested in my commits are now picked up by Jesper Devantier <[email protected]>

in the patch

https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/[email protected]/


Regards,

Saif


On 25-01-2026 11:46 pm, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi Saif,

On 27/11/25 13:02, Saif Abrar wrote:
Add properties for user specified PCI vendor, device, subsystem vendor
and subsystem IDs.

e.g. PCI IDs to be specified as follows:
-device nvme,id_vendor=0xABCD,id_device=0xA0B0,id_subsys_vendor=0xEF00,id_subsys=0xEF01

Signed-off-by: Saif Abrar <[email protected]>
---
v3 -> v4: Resolve merge commits when moving to the latest repo.

  hw/nvme/ctrl.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
  hw/nvme/nvme.h |  5 +++++
  2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/nvme/ctrl.c b/hw/nvme/ctrl.c
index cc4593cd42..d857be5496 100644
--- a/hw/nvme/ctrl.c
+++ b/hw/nvme/ctrl.c
@@ -8877,7 +8877,10 @@ static bool nvme_init_sriov(NvmeCtrl *n, PCIDevice *pci_dev, uint16_t offset,
                              Error **errp)
  {
      uint16_t vf_dev_id = n->params.use_intel_id ?
-                         PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_NVME : PCI_DEVICE_ID_REDHAT_NVME;
+                         PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_NVME :
+                         (n->params.id_device ?
+                         n->params.id_device : PCI_DEVICE_ID_REDHAT_NVME);
+
      NvmePriCtrlCap *cap = &n->pri_ctrl_cap;
      uint64_t bar_size = nvme_mbar_size(le16_to_cpu(cap->vqfrsm),
le16_to_cpu(cap->vifrsm),
@@ -8953,8 +8956,22 @@ static bool nvme_init_pci(NvmeCtrl *n, PCIDevice *pci_dev, Error **errp)
          pci_config_set_vendor_id(pci_conf, PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL);
          pci_config_set_device_id(pci_conf, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_NVME);
      } else {
-        pci_config_set_vendor_id(pci_conf, PCI_VENDOR_ID_REDHAT);
-        pci_config_set_device_id(pci_conf, PCI_DEVICE_ID_REDHAT_NVME);
+        uint16_t id_vendor = n->params.id_vendor ?
+                             n->params.id_vendor : PCI_VENDOR_ID_REDHAT;
+        pci_config_set_vendor_id(pci_conf, id_vendor);
+
+        uint16_t id_device = n->params.id_device ?
+                             n->params.id_device : PCI_DEVICE_ID_REDHAT_NVME;
+        pci_config_set_device_id(pci_conf, id_device);
+
+        if (n->params.id_subsys_vendor) {

Just set it directly?

+            pci_set_word(pci_conf + PCI_SUBSYSTEM_VENDOR_ID,
+ n->params.id_subsys_vendor);
+        }
+
+        if (n->params.id_subsys) {

Just set it directly?

+            pci_set_word(pci_conf + PCI_SUBSYSTEM_ID, n->params.id_subsys);
+        }
      }
        pci_config_set_class(pci_conf, PCI_CLASS_STORAGE_EXPRESS);
@@ -9409,6 +9426,11 @@ static const Property nvme_props[] = {
      DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("atomic.awun", NvmeCtrl, params.atomic_awun, 0),       DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("atomic.awupf", NvmeCtrl, params.atomic_awupf, 0),
      DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("ocp", NvmeCtrl, params.ocp, false),
+    DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("id_vendor", NvmeCtrl, params.id_vendor, 0),
+    DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("id_device", NvmeCtrl, params.id_device, 0),
+    DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("id_subsys_vendor", NvmeCtrl,
+ params.id_subsys_vendor, 0),
+    DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("id_subsys", NvmeCtrl, params.id_subsys, 0),

Just curious (I missed the previous version), why not use the default
value here instead of 0? For example:

  DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("id_device", NvmeCtrl, params.id_device,
                     PCI_DEVICE_ID_REDHAT_NVME),

  };
    static void nvme_get_smart_warning(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
diff --git a/hw/nvme/nvme.h b/hw/nvme/nvme.h
index 8f8c78c850..65fb168bc9 100644
--- a/hw/nvme/nvme.h
+++ b/hw/nvme/nvme.h
@@ -571,6 +571,11 @@ typedef struct NvmeParams {
      uint16_t atomic_awun;
      uint16_t atomic_awupf;
      bool     atomic_dn;
+
+    uint16_t id_vendor;
+    uint16_t id_device;
+    uint16_t id_subsys_vendor;
+    uint16_t id_subsys;
  } NvmeParams;
    typedef struct NvmeCtrl {


Reply via email to