Chris Uppal schrieb: > Chris Smith wrote: >> I think Marshall got this one right. The two are accomplishing >> different things. In one case (the dynamic case) I am safeguarding >> against negative consequences of the program behaving in certain non- >> sensical ways. In the other (the static case) I am proving theorems >> about the impossibility of this non-sensical behavior ever happening. > > And so conflating the two notions of type (-checking) as a kind of category > error ? If so then I see what you mean, and it's a useful distinction, but am > unconvinced that it's /so/ helpful a perspective that I would want to exclude > other perspectives which /do/ see the two as more-or-less trivial variants on > the same underlying idea.
It is indeed helpful. Just think of all the unit tests that you don't have to write. Regards, Jo -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
