On 2016-06-20, Phil Boutros <[email protected]> wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Quote:
>>
>> "Why do we have to write x!=y then argue about the status of x<>y when we
>> can simply write x≠y?"
>>
>> "Simply"?
>>
>> This is how I write x≠y from scratch:
><snip long, arduous process>
>
> To wrap this back full circle, here's how it's done on vim:
>
> Ctrl-K, =, ! (last two steps interchangeable). Done. Result: ≠
On any non-broken X11 system it's: <compose> = /
I generally configure my system so that the right-hand "windows" key
is <compose>. If I used it a lot, I'd probably configure the left
hand one to be the same.
> It's still probably a horrible idea to have it in a programming
> language, though, unless the original behaviour still also works.
Definitely. And we should allow overbar for logical inversion. I
never did figure out the X11 compose sequence for the XOR symbol...
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! Somewhere in DOWNTOWN
at BURBANK a prostitute is
gmail.com OVERCOOKING a LAMB CHOP!!
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
