Jonathan Ellis wrote: > Peter Hansen wrote: >>Or investigate the use of Irmen's Pyro package and how it could let you >>almost transparently move your code to a *multi-process* architecture > > Unless you're doing anything that would require distributed locking. > Many if not most such projects do, which is why almost everyone prefers > to use threads on an SMP machine instead of splitting it across > multiple smaller boxes.
I can't address the issue of whether or not "most" such projects require distributed locking, because I'm not familiar with more than half of such projects, as you appear to be. <wink> On the other hand, I am (somewhat) familiar with Jeffrey's stated problem area (two postings of his earlier in the thread) and it really doesn't sound like he needs such a thing. Would you normally expect to need distributed locking for a simple system where you had long-running computations and wanted to improve performance by using multiple CPUs? Of course, only he can tell for sure. -Peter -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
