----- Original Message -----
> notepad_1 = start("Notepad")
> notepad_2 = start("Notepad")
> notepad_1.write("Hello World!")
> notepad_1.press(CTRL + 'a', CTRL + 'c')
> notepad_2.press(CTRL + 'v')
>
> The problem with this design is that it effectively duplicates our
> API: We want to keep our "global" functions because they are so easy
> to read.
So is the example above. This is the best solution in my opinion.
I think you're having the same issue that some other APIs, let's say matplotlib
for example. They try to accommodate scientists (matlab) and
programmers(python) by having a double API style.
One looks like
legend()
title()
plot()
save()
the other looks like
fig = figure()
fig.add_legend()
fig.title()
fig.plot()
fig.save()
The problem is, when searching for example on the net, you'll end up with a mix
of both, it can become a nightmare.
I definitely prefer the later, for the reasons that have already been given to
you in this thread and by the fact that with the correct (I)python shell, you
can create your window object and get auto-completion on its methods just by
hitting <tab>, very helpful when introspecting objects. Can be achieved of
course in any python shell with function like dir() ; my point being that OOO
design keeps things in their place, see the zen of python "Namespaces are one
honking great idea -- let's do more of those!"
JM
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE:
The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for
any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
