--- On Tue, 5/18/10, Robert Kern <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Robert Kern <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Picking a license > To: [email protected] > Date: Tuesday, May 18, 2010, 12:03 PM > On 2010-05-16 09:25 , Ed Keith > wrote: > > > > --- On Sat, 5/15/10, Lawrence D'Oliveiro<[email protected]_zealand> > wrote: > > > >> From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro<[email protected]_zealand> > >> Subject: Re: Picking a license > >> To: [email protected] > >> Date: Saturday, May 15, 2010, 11:09 PM > >> In message<[email protected]>, > >> Ed Keith > >> wrote: > >> > >>> But if my client give someone else a copy of > the > >> binary I gave them, they > >>> are now in violation. > >> > >> Why would they be in violation? It seems to me a > violation > >> would only occur > >> if someone asked them for the source, and they > refused. > >> -- > >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > >> > > > > No, the GPL makes it clear that the responsibly is on > the distributor to either supply the source or written > notice, Caveat venditor. The violation exists regardless of > whether or not the recipient makes a request. > > No, one of the options for you is that you make the source > available upon request. >
But I am required to give written notice to that effect. -EdK Ed Keith [email protected] Blog: edkeith.blogspot.com -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
