"Joachim Strömbergson" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> Even so, choosing md5 in 2009 for something that (hopefully) will be > used in years is a bad design decision. It creates a dependency for to > an algorithm that all sensible recommendations point you to move away > from. Why not write the field as algorithm:value? e.g. sha1:8590b685654367e3eba70dc00df7e45e88c21da4 Installers can fallback to using hashlib.new(), so you can plug in a new algorithm without changing the PEP or the installer code.
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
